In a review of field audits conducted by the State Controller’s
Office, it was found that 65% of the total amount claimed
by school districts was disallowed. The primary reason cited
for this adjustment was due to districts claiming reimbursable
costs without sufficient supporting documentation.
Axiom’s Mandate Timekeeper™ sets the standard
for complying with the state’s requirement for contemporaneous
logging of mandate activities. The program assists districts
in identifying and organizing the required supporting documentation
necessary to file a claim. When employees use Mandate Timekeeper™,
all their entries are automatically stored in the application;
including the date and time when activity was entered, the
date of the activity, and whether are not adequate documentation
is available to support their time.
Most other vendors employ the “traditional method”
of mandate data gathering. Through the audit process this
method has been tested, and later found to be inadequate to
support the claims that were filed by these vendors; resulting
in huge reductions of the claimed amount. These same vendors
charge a premium for their labor intensive services. With
Axiom’s timekeeper, districts are able to harness the
power of technology and enjoy the benefits of lower preparation
costs, better documentation, and a significantly lower risk
of claim reduction.
In the event of an audit, Axiom will be able to provide the
district with an audit defense CD which will contain the time
records of all staff, along with a complete list of supporting
documents stored in Mandate Timekeeper™.
Consider whether your district would prefer to utilize technology
at a lower price, or pay significantly more for inferior and
labor intensive service. First, review the reports shown below
that display audit results of claims filed using the “traditional
method” of data collection. Next, explore Axiom’s
Mandate Timekeeper™ program and you’ll find a
stronger product and better way of gathering and organizing
your mandate activities.
| %
Disallowed |
Program
Audited |
Years
Audited |
Reason(s)
Disallowed |
25% |
AIDS
Prevention Instruction |
07/01/1999-06/30/2002 |
District claimed unsupported costs and did not reduce
claimed costs by federal funds. |
0% |
AIDS
Prevention Instruction |
07/01/2001-06/30/2003 |
None disallowed |
66% |
Annual
Parent Notification |
07/01/1997-06/30/2000 |
District was unable to support the number of annual
parent notifications/applications claimed. |
86% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/1999-06/30/2001 |
District did not provide documentation to support labor
hours and supplies claimed. |
69% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2000-06/30/2004 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
51% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2001-06/30/2004 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
46% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
44% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2002-06/30/2005 |
District claimed costs that were not supported and/or ineligible. |
34% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2000-06/30/2004 |
District claimed ineligible and unsupported costs. |
32% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2000-06/30/2004 |
District claimed costs that were ineligible and unsupported costs for salaries and benefits. |
32% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2000-06/30/2004 |
District claimed costs that were not supported and/or ineligible. |
29% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/1999-06/30/2003 |
District overstated salary and benefit costs, and miscalculated
contract services costs. |
26% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2001-06/30/2004 |
District claimed costs that were not supported and/or ineligible. |
20% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2000-06/30/2002 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
17% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2001-06/30/2004 |
District claimed costs that were not supported and/or ineligible. |
17% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported and/or ineligible. |
15% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed unsupported and ineligible costs, and
did not apply the Winton Act District costs offset. |
9% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
7% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2000-06/30/2004 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
5% |
Collective
Bargaining |
07/01/2001-06/30/2004 |
District made calculation errors in the claims, duplicated
costs, and claimed costs that were not reimbursable. |
100% |
Emergency
Procedures, Earthquake Procedures and Disasters |
07/01/2001-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported with
adequate documentation |
100% |
Emergency
Procedures, Earthquake Procedures and Disasters |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported with
adequate documentation |
99% |
Emergency
Procedures, Earthquake Procedures and Disasters |
07/01/2001-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported with
adequate documentation |
98% |
Emergency
Procedures, Earthquake Procedures and Disasters |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed unsupported salary and benefit costs,
and related indirect costs. |
97% |
Emergency
Procedures, Earthquake Procedures and Disasters |
07/01/2001-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
85% |
Emergency
Procedures, Earthquake Procedures and Disasters |
07/01/2001-06/30/2003 |
District claimed salary and related benefits that were
not supported with adequate documentation. |
75% |
Emergency
Procedures, Earthquake Procedures and Disasters |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
43% |
Emergency
Procedures, Earthquake Procedures and Disasters |
07/01/1999-06/30/2003 |
District claimed unsupported costs and costs not reimbursable
under mandated program. |
100% |
Graduation
Requirements |
07/01/1998-06/30/2002 |
District did not support that it incurred increased
costs for staffing and supplying the new science courses
mandated by legislation. |
100% |
Graduation
Requirements |
07/01/1999-06/30/2002 |
District did not support that it incurred increased
costs for staffing and supplying the new science courses
mandated by legislation. |
100% |
Graduation
Requirements |
07/01/1999-06/30/2002 |
District did not support that it incurred increased
costs for staffing and supplying the new science courses
mandated by legislation. |
100% |
Graduation
Requirements |
07/01/1999-06/30/2001 |
District's claims exceeded its increased costs for staffing
and supplying the new science classes mandated by legislation. |
100% |
Habitual
Truant |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
100% |
Habitual
Truant |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed ineligible and unsupported costs |
76% |
Habitual
Truant |
01/01/2001-06/30/2003 |
District claimed ineligible activities and salary and
benefit costs that were not supported with adequate documentation. |
10% |
Habitual
Truant |
07/01/1998-06/30/2001 |
District claimed ineligible costs and did not apply
offsetting revenues. |
6% |
Habitual
Truant |
07/01/2000-06/30/2002 |
District overstated the number of reimbursable initial
truancy notification forms distributed. |
100% |
Intradistrict
Attendance |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported with
adequate documentation |
100% |
Intradistrict
Attendance |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
84% |
Intradistrict
Attendance |
07/01/1998-06/30/2001 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
77% |
Intradistrict
Attendance |
07/01/2000-06/30/2002 |
District claimed costs that were not supported with
adequate documentation or were not related to the mandate,
and did not reduce claimed costs by offsetting reimbursements. |
54% |
Intradistrict
Attendance |
07/01/1999-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs for salaries and benefits that
were not adequately supported. |
33% |
Intradistrict
Attendance |
07/01/2001-06/30/2003 |
District claimed unallowable salary and benefit costs. |
97% |
Law Enforcement Agency Notification |
07/01/2001-06/30/2004 |
District claimed ineligible activities. |
7% |
Mandate
Reimbursement Process |
07/01/1999-06/30/2001 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
100% |
Notification
of Truancy |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District did not provide documentation to support the
claimed number of truancy letters distributed and it distributed
initial truancy notifications forms that did not contain
all the specified elements required by the mandate. |
100% |
Notification
of Truancy |
07/01/1998-06/30/2001 |
District was not able to support the claimed number
of notification of truancy forms distributed to a pupil's
parent or guardian. |
100% |
Notification
of Truancy |
07/01/99 - 06/30/2002 |
District was not able to support the claimed number
of notification of truancy forms distributed to a pupil's
parent or guardian. |
100% |
Notification
of Truancy |
07/01/1998-06/30/2000 |
District was unable to support the claimed number of
notification of truancy forms distributed to a pupil's
parent or guardian. |
96% |
Notification
of Truancy |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
90% |
Notification
of Truancy |
07/01/1999-06/30/2002 |
District overclaimed the number of reimbursable truancy
notifications. |
89% |
Notification
of Truancy |
07/01/1999-06/30/2002 |
District overclaimed the number of reimbursable truancy
notifications. |
44% |
Notification
of Truancy |
07/01/1999-06/30/2002 |
District distributed initial truancy notifications that
did not contain the specified elements required by the
mandate. |
19% |
Notification
of Truancy |
07/01/1999-06/30/2002 |
District claimed costs of notifications issued to pupils
with less than four truancies. |
12% |
Notification
of Truancy |
07/01/2001-06/30/2004 |
District claimed unsupported and nonreimbursable initial
truancy notifications. |
0% |
Notification
of Truancy |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
None disallowed |
100% |
Notification
to Teachers: Pupils Subject to Suspension or Expulsion |
07/01/2000-06/30/2001 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
85% |
Notification
to Teachers: Pupils Subject to Suspension or Expulsion |
07/01/1999-06/30/2002 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
44% |
Notification
to Teachers: Pupils Subject to Suspension or Expulsion |
07/01/2001-06/30/2003 |
District claimed unallowable salary, benefit and related
indirect costs. |
70% |
Pupil
Exclusions |
07/01/1999-06/30/2001 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
3% |
Pupil Promotion and Retention |
07/01/1997-06/30/1999
&
07/01/2001-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported and/or ineligible. |
100% |
Removal
of Chemicals |
07/01/1999-06/30/2002 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
0% |
School
Accountability Report Cards |
07/01/2001-06/30/2002 |
None disallowed. |
100% |
School District of Choice: Transfers and Appeals |
07/01/1999-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
100% |
School District of Choice: Transfers and Appeals |
07/01/2000-06/30/2003 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
100% |
School District of Choice: Transfers and Appeals |
07/01/1999-06/30/2002 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
100% |
School District of Choice: Transfers and Appeals |
07/01/2000-06/30/2002 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
100% |
School District of Choice: Transfers and Appeals |
07/01/2001-06/30/2002 |
District claimed costs that were not supported and/or ineligible. |
77% |
Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) |
07/01/2001-06/30/2004 |
District claimed costs that were not supported. |
36% |
Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) |
07/01/2001-06/30/2004 |
District claimed costs that were not supported and/or ineligible. |